Germany peaceful country, that was the principle according to the unspeakable suffering of the Second World War. The Basic Law states: "Human dignity is inviolable" and "all power comes from the people of" and "Everyone has the right to life and physical integrity" and "against anyone who undertakes to eliminate this order (the rule of law democracy), have all Germans have the right to resist, if no other remedy is possible "and Article 102 GG" The death penalty is abolished "! According to Article 87a para 2 GG is subject to the deployment of the Bundeswehr such as a constitutional reservation, that is, the use of inside is allowed only if the Basic Law it explicitly allowed and even that is a good reason so! Our Basic Law is not only of our constitutional fathers, but to a considerable extent by the alleierten victors been written, with the aim to prevent war. All very worthy and important tools, but by degrees, in public, thanks to our are inertia, of the "people's representatives" limited and even eliminated! Over the loss of press freedom, I had already reported several times. Now there's more to be precise about everything! The route from the Republic to empire is apparently taken. I will now have two examples show the each upright Democrats, the blood freeze in his veins would, outspoken, challenged and sometimes even enforced by the so-called "moderate democratic parties of the center":
Example 1:
"The dignity of man is inviolable, "" Everyone has the right to life and physical integrity " and "The death penalty is abolished"
The sad reality:
Federal Westerwelle had earlier this month stresses without showing reasons to offer, that targeted killings under international law in Afghanistan "clearly" are legal Previously, the federal. Defense Ministry after the release of numerous secret documents of the U.S. military in Afghanistan same insured, but insists that the U.S. Task Force 373, the basis of lists of terror suspects targeted off (and would rather not captures), can only provide information and the KSK to capture. The following statements limit of ISAF Brigadier General Josef Dieter Blotz speak a different story: "It is also one of the tasks of the KSK special forces to hunt Taliban target and" turn off "! Targeted killings by special forces, the Ministry of Defence has ruled out definitely. According Blotz But "The special forces (KSK), the Bundeswehr is also been advocated to eliminate networks of extremists preventive" So targeted killings not to shut down (just another word for it) of "extremists" and "networks" already? The number of special forces had in the last eighteen months has risen sharply, Blotz further said and added but then added that one must see targeted killings "sober".
are the puns and turns of those who know that your doing is illegal, and neither by law nor by reason of international law! Here is an excerpt from ratified international humanitarian law which is also of Germany and the allegedly loud Westerwelle covers targeted killings of terrorists:
"It is prohibited to attack unarmed civilians, military programs. The killing of any kind is prohibited by the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949. Even a "combatant" may only be attacked if he reveals himself as armed as such and immediately takes part in hostilities. An execution or killing is prohibited without trial "
Here is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966, which was ratified Germany and the U.S.: " Everyone has the inherent right to life ", it is said here. Constitutional issues related to the "targeted killing" of terrorists are not explicitly clarified because they were always resolved completely sufficient. Both the Constitution and international law do not know any legitimate targeted killing! Again, for better understanding: The killing in self-defense and to direct military Conflict to or death to a hostage, has nothing to do with the precautionary slaughter of Taliban and other opponents system, as practiced by Americans, Israelis, British, Chinese, Russians, and perhaps even by German special forces. I think the term for playing down extremely. Targeted killing is nothing but vicious, premeditated murder of a suspect! A "great" example of targeted killing as there have been about five years ago in the London Underground when a young Brazilian was killed by so-called security forces, while being helpless lying on the floor, with a total of seven shots to the head. The young Brazilian Electrician was on his way to work just a bit too late and therefore a hurry, so totally innocent! What makes this case, however, still horrible, the fact that the officers executed ended Him is never been brought to justice. That is precisely why, in order to prevent such a thing, were incorporated into the Basic Law barriers, they try our "democratic" parties to overturn step by step. In this context I find it to circumvent the constitution in through the Lisbon treaty, it leads through the back door of riots and the like, the death penalty again:
An example of the absurdity of this "constitution", which will come with the Basic Law is enough like: The statement on the death penalty. Let's look at the "Final Act", the "Declarations concerning provisions of the Constitution", then we see "Title 1", the "dignity of man" describes the article 2 / 2, which reads: "No person shall for . be sentenced death penalty or executed "What does this seemingly clear wording, however, tells us the attached explanatory note to Article 2, which is treated the same legal value:" A State may provide in its law the death penalty. " Limited, this clean bill on the death penalty with regard to war or an imminent threat of war and, in turn, any interpretation permitting reference to "a riot or insurrection is put down lawful". Who defines that a riot? Were the Monday demonstrations in Dresden, Berlin and Leipzig a riot? If the anti-nuclear power or even the demos Aufsände Stuttgart 21, directed against legitimate but indeed absurd projects? In case of escalation, the currently not a lawyer to answer exactly! This legal gray area, however, creates space for the real extremists, the national parliaments, and in the EU Council and European Parliament! The ISAF as cavorts in the legal gray zone of the UN mandate, which states that all military appropriations must be reached to the target. (This refers to protection, however, and the open fight and not on preventive measures, such as the killing of opponents in his sleep in their houses) on just this way, killings of civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq suspect legitimacy. All free to interpretation! Just try to create EU politicians are no rules, so that they can always be circumvented! Best examples of EU emergency situations have been freely chosen by snout and against any law: The non-compliance with stability pact, which had thrown overboard Bailotklausel, the uncontrolled buying government bonds, etc., etc.! Who several times so unrestrained breaks its own laws, will also interpret everything in human rights as it suits him in that stuff! Such an octopus have rückradlose how the EU had to put on the Basic Law of the biggest mistake that our "representatives" ever committed!
Example 2
"All power emanates from the people," "against anyone who undertakes to correct the order (rule of law democracy), all Germans have the right to resist, if no other remedy is not possible," " the deployment of the Bundeswehr inside is allowed only if the Basic Law expressly allows him "
sad reality:
following statement was by Angela Merkel at the anniversary celebration of the CDU on 17 June 2005 made, so the former German Unity Day:
"Germany had no legal claim to democracy and social market economy for all eternity" items, visit
Revisited .. . Merkel's second Oath of office, they can not even memorize ... and that without raising your hand!
This statement should be even melt on your tongue! Angela Merkel vowed
on the Basic Law and to the democratic order your oath and betraying him clear with this sentence! There is indeed a fundamental right and a right to democracy in our country as long as it is, of course! So if this statement Merkel seriously, there are really only two possibilities! Option one: The FRG has stopped deleting the old Article 23 of the Basic Law in 1990 to exist. Or can two: Mrs. Merkel has to create in the future in the Germany, then you would yourself and your vassals actually a case for the Protection of the Constitution, whose task is indeed probably the protection and maintenance of the democratic order of the FRG! The setting Mrs Merkel is also reflected in their attitude to referenda at the federal level. In a statement on the referendum, they said that a one-vote in four years, so probably sufficient for a democracy and referendums would paralyze the decision making process. Funny that Switzerland (per capita economic performance world championship in the USA and Germany) can best live with the people decide! Also refers to the former GDR FDJ propaganda functionary: "You can not be sure to leave it, that what is said before the elections even after the elections is" (see video evidence below)
Let us not forget .... When we are all scenarios in the real enemies of democracy to overthrow, so all Germans have the right to counter sand!
Reminder: All major decisions in recent years went past the people: whether €, Lisbon Treaty, Afghanistan, or countries under the bailout, all against the will of the people. We continue with the deployment of the Bundeswehr in the interior of which is prohibited for good reason.
There are in German history, not a single positive experience in the use of armed military inside. It always ended in political repression or murder, even as the Social Democrats at the beginning of the Weimar Republic, the Free Corps crackdown Employing the revolutionary movement was not a badge of honor. The often heard argument that unlike previously, now the Democrats bear responsibility for the use in the interior is so historically refuted by the role of Friedrich Ebert and Gustav Noske. Nevertheless, politicians such as Wolfgang Schäuble require a constitutional amendment undaunted.
Hamburg / Berlin - He does not let up: Federal Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU), insisted on a constitutional amendment to ensure that the Bundeswehr can be deployed in Germany. After the elections it would add a new start. "This remains a task for the coming legislative period," Schäuble said the "Hamburger Abendblatt:
"In the fight against terror, it could very special threat situations abroad give as domestic, in which the use of armed forces should be allowed in addition. But would the army the legal basis be given by a constitutional amendment. "
If these statements Schäuble and Merkel in the context of opposing the death penalty in the Lisbon Treaty and to extreme action by the police against their citizens, and in connection with the highly seeded modern State law provides, then one can be a bit weird! Can you imagine what would have been going on, for example if the left such statements were launched from the dock? An uproar there would have been left unemployed and the dozen members of parliament. Actually, probably even survive "representatives" as Westerwelle, Merkel and Schäuble such statements are not political, but appears in a climate of general broke the law to have become socially acceptable something in the middle. Sun feist and dishonest as this corrupt political world of the "democratic parties" to the people governed by them does not need a dwindling turnout to complain! Parties of the left and rights are observed by the intelligence, the pirates is denied as incompetent and good splinter parties like the PDV (Party of the reason) to be laughed at from above. All this and much more practiced by the true enemies of democracy, our form of government (if they can because a) is from the inside out, do away apparently before our very eyes and under the protection of all state institutions and, while not even a leaf their mouth ... .. a scandal! "This is the performance of bureaucrats and well clear of the dark side of power! May the other side of the Force be with us" ... in that sense ...
Greetings
your Micha
Sources:
The Press - Todesstafe in EU constitution
Heise Online - Soderkommando KSK and targeted killings
Daily News - Westermann shaft supports targeted killings
Süddeutsche Zeitung - Bundeswehr inside - for arsenic's constitution
0 comments:
Post a Comment