should I recently read for the music industry an important court decision in order to explain this to the other team over. Consisting of several pages copy but saw not look after a court ruling. Since I already knew, that for any decision is at least 100 other documents, I assumed that I was possibly sent the wrong document.
startled me and the imprint "Second amended final judment. How then is to understand now? Once you skin out a verdict and if you are not satisfied then change it again as a precaution ("to amend") and then calls it "final" before there is even more nagging? According to the motto: "So this decision I mean really seriously now this is my final version!." Or how, or what?
was only the last paragraph of the court decision then a little insight. There it was held that this decision the previous decision from 1950 (!) be repealed. That actually made some sense, because the amended text has been expanded to streaming licenses and 1950, there were no nunmal streaming, but the birth of rock'n'roll after all, was already before. Here in the "code based Germany" we know so little, of course, not to change an opinion, because there are new laws adopted instead.
Still surprised me still the structure of the appeal, which more resembled a contract, because such was the beginning of definitions. Perhaps the judges before the clothing of his duties, a judge, " Motherfucking Litigator? But he also has to Surely - like us also - adhere to certain rules on the ruling establishment, when he was elected judge? A consultation with my lawyer friend on the ground revealed: "No, he has not." In the Law School to become informed but, as a verdict would be "nice", but it has to hold not a judge. When I explained that that we already have rules for a verdict and the facts already a certain building followed, everyone was very enthusiastic about it. Well, that would also be one or the other degree thesis on the 2nd Exam easier if there were no rules for the sentencing structure.
0 comments:
Post a Comment