mentally If not quite fittest girls say climate warming is great, so that they can often put on her bikini, you'd think it was better to ignore them. Of course you can see (s) like a pretty woman in a bikini and these naive women are apparently even more honest and closer to the truth than many climate watchers. Has long been arguing that is the most climate scientists in the world about global warming, which the media is unfortunately mostly not reported, there is mainly the views propagated that our climate is getting warmer and we all are heading for a heat emergency. But the fact is that our planet is doing just the opposite, he is struggling. stagnated for over ten years global warming since 2006 despite rising CO2 and climate curve is even. This made me quite frankly a little surprised, especially as I was until about 2 years a faithful member of the climate pessimists to Al Gore. Since I'm always been a very curious person, I decided to tell me about information in late 2008 to be neutral on the subject and the more information I collected, and this made known, the more grim, serious and polemical seemed my "brethren" for a "heat death to 'argue the Earth. That made me suspicious! So what's wrong now? Are we all in the future in a warm ocean to drown or freeze to death? Since this is not something appears unimportant, I will address today, once this issue.
What is CO2?
First, let's clarify what CO2 is about! CO2 is primarily a food for plants and a fertilizer that is applied from the air. Rising CO2 levels since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution (from 280 ppm to about 380 ppm today) provided, for example, in wheat a crop increase of 61 percent, vegetables by about 51 percent (Idso et al. 2003). It was also shown that plants are more resistant to rising CO2 rates of stress and need less water. Only then were able to now seven billion people will be fed at all. To poison CO2 can be when its share would rise to two percent in the atmosphere. (Current CO2 0.038 percent share), an increase of the over 50-fold would be necessary for this. It is by far not enough oil, coal or wood for such an increase exists. Ergo, the CO2 poison classification of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency wrong and simply a lie!
opinions diagrams manipulation
course, the CO2 concentration has risen by humans, but has since also something to do with the alleged warming? Michael E. Mann is co-developer of the so-called hockey stick graph, which is the explicit connection between CO2 increase and to represent global warming. This chart is used as the basis of the global climate. It is thus the appearance of raised, as if the temperature would have made in recent decades has not since 1000 years before known giant leap upward, triggered by higher CO2 concentrations due to industrial development. The truth is, however, that it has always been climate changes in history, to prove (mostly dependent on the sun and Meeresstömungen) such as long-time charts and historical records! For example, the Vikings built in the Middle Ages to Greenland cereals. The translation of Greenland is nothing but pasture! Our current temperature is even the optimum in history and no dangerous exception! See long-term chart (mean age temperature and today) below:
funny is that the raw data required to skeptical scientists who's able to understand theory, had suddenly disappeared. Take that once before .... It is said the mathematical principles of "salvation for humanity" are gone ... ridiculous! To further the Unseriösität Erderwärmungsanhänger certainly contributed to the so-called air-gate scandal. Hackers cracked the e-mail accounts of the world's most leading climate scientists. The hacked and published E-mail from leading climate researchers at the CRU have massive irregularities: the "climate scientists" held back deliberately manipulated data, research publications and coiffed, studies that contradicted their theory to be proved. Mr. Hadley and Phil Jones, the director of the UK's Climate Research Unit has confirmed the hack attack now. "If it should confirm the authenticity of previously published material, and it is after reading several samples of no reasonable doubt, this should lead to some leading IPCC scientists, and they advocate the theories of anthropogenic global warming very uncomfortable be. . Also in Copenhagen is much at stake, "It is not just hackers and alternative researchers are not convinced of global warming and serious researchers to follow the general trend is not everything:
Current voices from science
Augusto Mangini is paleoclimatologist at the University of Heidelberg. Mangini is concerned with natural climate changes that have taken place in the history of our planet has always been. Although he is convinced that global warming was in the past 50 years caused by the greenhouse effect by man - but only to a small extent:
"In addition to anthrophogenen - ie the man-made -. global warming is the observed temperature increase is mainly composed of natural climate variability, "said Mangini his opinion, relates the IPCC of the United Nations (IPCC) that natural climate variation is not sufficient in its calculations of the temperature curve of the last 100 years. The IPCC is the most influential research body in the international climate policy and should really be interested in the latest climate data.
Hans von Storch, a climate researcher and meteorologist at the University of Hamburg, warns against dramatizing tendencies in climate research. Finally, he expressed sharp criticism of the authors of the Copenhagen-diagnosis - A study that predicts a temperature increase of up to seven degrees over the next 100 years. These researchers wanted first and foremost "the fears increase from climate change," said von Storch. "They want to impose a political agenda." In general would in climate research, "the science is often the servant of politics, or - worse yet - they even tried to make policy."
Just a few months, the British Hadley Centre for Climate Change new excitement with its latest calculations the average global temperature fanned: From 1999 to 2008, the world has warmed by only 0.07 degrees Celsius, therefore - and not those of 0.2 degrees Celsius in the still of the UN IPCC IPCC assumes. Calculate apparent one forget the two natural climate events El Niño and La Niña out, then only one temperature trend of 0.0 degrees Celsius, the British experts ascertaining numerical - that stop and now the temperatures drop even!
Even NASA has determined that the North Pole ice is back bigger and bigger. Blue thin ice - thick ice red. Nasa satellite photo evidence below:
So what's our Resume from all this contradictions. Outbursts of joy among the gardeners who ... could save from the morning of your heating costs greenhouses by something derived CO2 in their greenhouses?! Hardly! I'm no expert, but I have noticed personally that starry nights are still much colder than nights and covered that in my humble opinion, the heat dissipation of the planet seems to work with a little more CO2 works perfectly. Steam to a very large cloud-shaped play occur in connection with methane gas that is a much higher "greenhouse gas" role! But why do you recognize these natural and necessary "Cold Killer" of the earth not in and chopped off so much on the CO2 around, although this gas is a minor ore Role in global warming is playing? Is it just about the scourging of our lifestyle? Certainly one can say probably not, but it forces itself on a something. It is probably unique that scientists warn, together with politicians, political movements and companies with in the scientific data provided and forecasts together in front of a global catastrophe to force a reorientation of lifestyles, economics, technology and energy resources as quickly as possible should be - and that because of data not be clearly established, even manipulated, falsified and then "fine-sampled" were. One thing is for me anyway stated: "We make it faster to destroy us with economic chaos and wars, as the rise of ocean levels, even by one meter by melt water!" Do not get me wrong, I'm sure for a healthy and clean air catalysts and clean energy, but I'm not by political bigwigs, the "drinking wine and water preaching" even on this false scientific basis of a guilty conscience inoculate when I hear about my hard-earned money once a year to go on holiday or flying. I'm really sorry!
Greetings
your Micha
Sources:
ZDF - Is there a climate lie
All smoke and mirrors - North Pole ice does not melt
mirror - the weakening at the sun
Epoch Times - The climate lie
0 comments:
Post a Comment