The head of the Home Away Group, which www.fewo-direkt.de heard, has allegedly in an interview with the New York Times voiced this.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/05/travel/05pracrentals.html?_r=1&em
Here his translator Interview:
"The removal of reviews is extremely rare and occurs only if the landlord tangible Has evidence that the apartment has slandered tenant the landlord unfair.
We are more than willing to lose landlords of our site, if that our clients' deal not fair or the listing is misleading. "
(Brian Sharples, chief executive of Home Away, said removal of a review was" extremely rare "and occurred only after the company had tangible proof that the renter unfairly maligned the owner." We are more than willing to lose property owners from our site if they are not treating OUR CUSTOMERS fairly or their advertisements are misleading, ")
funny that you, as Ferienwohnunginserent, of course, pays for the ad, are not designated as a customer, but the rental inquiries.
And what is "fair deal"? It's more than subjective. For the tenant it would be fair if he can rent for free with us. And even what you have agreed in the lease, may still be considered "unfair"?
and how the 'customers homeaway.com "treat our landlord does not matter? Why is the head of www.homeaway.com did not say that the "customers Homeaway.com" us and our property owner "fair treatment" do?
Who are we for this Home Away group?
And what is "unfair maligning"? So there is fair for defamation www.fewo-direkt.de? And tangible evidence "we have to submit landlord ....
And how can a one by surfing visitor who might also charged that" his client of Homeaway.com "if he has no contract with www.homeaway.com, no pay?
And why is home away "more than happy" to lose ourselves landlord? What is misleading?
Many U.S. tourists believe Air Condition, ie that in every room AC.
Should we at www.fewo-direkt.de Leave etc: "Only a central air conditioning" so that your ad is not misleading
And why should I submit "tangible evidence" of the website .... I pay? ?
And when I say "vilified, but not" to "only" fair can provide tangible evidence, then take an assessment within my paid advertisement and I have no Mitanfragen more?
Apartment Owners should examine very carefully whether and where they can still turn in the network advertising.
0 comments:
Post a Comment